Did you know that the United States Supreme Court abolished federal rights to abortion? This article will explain the current situation.
Roe v. Wade, the foundation of constitutional rights beyond abortion, has been lost in its importance over the past 50 years. This Supreme Court decision on Friday was rejected. It makes clear that other rights, such as the right to contraception and interracial marriages, that are based on the same principle, like those for same-gender marriage, interracial marriages, or the right to use contraception, could also be at risk. For more information, see Clarence Thomas on Contraception.
Contraception and the same-gender marriage: Legal challenges
A concurring opinion from conservative Justice Clarence Thomas covered up Friday’s US Supreme Court ruling that ended the long-standing constitutional protection against abortion. He asked the court to reconsider decisions it made about same-gender contraception and marriage. Thomas said that Roe’s end would not be the end for the LGBTQ community, adding to the already overwhelming concern.
Supreme Court ContraceptionRuling Griswold v. Connecticut case
In 1965, the Griswold v. Connecticut case established that a married couple can use contraception freely without government interference. Also, the court ruled that sodomy could not be criminalized by states. In Obergefell, v. Hodged (2015), the court ruled that same-sex couples can marry. All three of the landmark Roe v. Wade decisions and Planned Parenthood.v. Casey rulings had been made before Friday. They established legal rights to abortion care. However, their legal analysis largely relied on the concept of constitutional.
Supreme Court Contraception Case
Biden asked the Department of Health and Human Services for access to contraceptives and abortion medicine. However, it is not clear if this strategy will be accepted by the court. States may prohibit contraception from being provided without a court order, especially for intrauterine devices (IUDs), and emergency contraceptive methods like the morning-after pill. They can also prosecute medical professionals who give it. IUDs and emergency contraception can also be subject to laws that certain states wish to pursue.
These details relate to legal issues regarding contraception and same-gender marriage. If there are any developments on this issue, we’ll keep you informed.
Final thoughts Clarence Thomas, Contraception
This study shows that Roe V. Wade is no longer the central principle of constitutional rights other than abortion. This was evident in Friday’s ruling by the highest court to reverse this decision.
